Fullscreen
Loading...
 
[Show/Hide Left Column]
[Show/Hide Right Column]

Mohr v. Williams

Mohr v. Williams, 104 N.W. 12 (Minn. 1905).

Facts: A physician performed a surgical operation on a patient’s left ear. He had permission to perform surgery, but only on the patient’s right ear.

Issue: The Supreme Court of Minnesota addressed the question of whether a physician had the discretion to perform a surgical operation on a patient’s left ear when he had only received authorization from the patient to perform an operation on her right ear.

Held: The Mohr court ruled that such unauthorized contact constituted a battery:
Analysis: Operations carried out by physicians without a plaintiff’s consent, and without exigent or emergency circumstances present that might justify such performance, are unacceptable and “unlawful.” No person may have his right to physical security violated by another without his permission. Such touching, without consent, amounts to an assault and battery.


Contributors to this page: jbennardo1 .
Page last modified on Wednesday 22 of December, 2010 15:03:56 GMT by jbennardo1.
The content on this page is licensed under the terms of the Copyright License.

Portions © 2006-2011 by Michael Risch, Some Rights Reserved | Copyright Notice| Legal Disclaimer